1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Ch. MUHAMMAD SHAFI Versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman |
| Parties | Ch. MUHAMMAD SHAFI Versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Ch. MUHAMMAD SHAFI Versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S. Jamshed Ali Shah for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 12th March, 1991
Headnotes / Summary
Appellant who was communicated adverse remarks had unblemished career as a government servant spreading over 35 years
Quality and output of work of appellant was not consistent with the adverse remarks
Minister during his visit to area of appellant's jurisdiction had appreciated work and conduct of appellant
Remarks in the pen picture were not justified
Countersigning Authority had incorrectly recorded about appellant's integrity for which proper course was to hold an inquiry to find out truth and to afford proper opportunity to appellant to explain his position which was not done
Adverse remarks, held were liable to be expunged being unjustified and the same were ordered to be struck off from the A.C.R. of the appellant.
Judgment & Decree
ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY and another Appeal No. 3 of 1989, decided on 19th March, 1991
Appellant who was communicated adverse remarks had unblemished career as a government servant spreading over 35 years
Quality and output of work of appellant was not consistent with the adverse remarks
Minister during his visit to area of appellant's jurisdiction had appreciated work and conduct of appellant
Remarks in the pen picture were not justified
Countersigning Authority had incorrectly recorded about appellant's integrity for which proper course was to hold an inquiry to find out truth and to afford proper opportunity to appellant to explain his position which was not done
Adverse remarks, held were liable to be expunged being unjustified and the same were ordered to be struck off from the A.C.R. of the appellant. S. Jamshed Ali Shah for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 12th March, 1991