2008 PLP 180 (MLD)
Mrs. BILQEES — Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN COMMERCIAL COURT SINDH AT KARACHI and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 180 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mrs. BILQEES — Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN COMMERCIAL COURT SINDH AT KARACHI and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 180 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 180 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 180 (MLD) (Mrs. BILQEES — Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN COMMERCIAL COURT SINDH AT KARACHI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Muhammad Kazim for Petitioner.
- Abbas Ali, Addl. A.-G. for Respondent No.1.
- Syed Tariq Ali for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.199
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A
Constitutional petition
Petitioner had sought bail on the ground that she had been released on bail on personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000
Record showed that petitioner had already undergone more than the prescribed punishment of three years
No justification in circumstances existed for imposing any further condition except personal bond.
Judgment & Decree
MUSHIR ALAM, J.
Petitioner seeks bail on the ground that she has since been ordered to be released on bail on personal bond in the sum of Rs.100,000 such order was passed on 7-1-2006. It appears that the petitioner had already undergone more than the prescribed punishment of three years. Under circumstances, we are of the view that there is no justification for imposing any further condition except personal bond. Petition is allowed in terms above. As regards quashment of the proceedings to clear the clog on his name petitioner may file appropriate application for acquittal before the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court is directed to decide the same preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing. It is pointed out by the learned counsel that his Application for acquittal is pending before learned trial Court which is lying vacant since June, 2006, let copy of this order be sent to the learned MIT to bring such fact to the notice of the Honourable Chief Justice so that some officer is appointed and vacancy is filled. H.B.T. /B-24/K Petition allowed.