YLR 2001

2001 PLP 2884 (YLR)

ARSHAD alias BILDER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. 955 of 2001, decided on 16th August, 2001.
Honorable Judges
Faiz Muhammad Qureshi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2001 PLP 2884 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Faiz Muhammad Qureshi, J
Parties ARSHAD alias BILDER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 2884 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 2884 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Faiz Muhammad Qureshi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 2884 (YLR) (ARSHAD alias BILDER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Date of hearing: 16th August, 2001

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34

Bail, grant of

Only piece of evidence against the accused was in shape of confessional statement of the co-accused, who in his statement had implicated the accused-- Confessional statement of co-accused could not form basis of conviction of the accused-- No recovery whatsoever was effected from the possession of the accused and no identification parade of the accused had been held

Earlier the accused was released by the police, but after about three years was again arrested on the basis of confessional statement

Accused having been able to make out good prima facie case for grant of bail, he was admitted to bail. 1993 P Cr. L J 1919 ref. Mrs. Samina Sohail Qadir for Applicant. Habib-ur-Rasheed for A. G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Mrs. Samina Sohail Qadir for Applicant. Habib-ur-Rasheed for A. G. for the State. Date of hearing: 16th August, 2001 Present applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 173 of 1994 under section 302/34, P.P.C. registered with Police Station Saddar, Karachi, South. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the name of the applicant does not appear in the F. I. R. and he has been challaned alongwith co-accused namely and respectively. Imran and Shafiq. On 21-9-1997 the applicant was arrested and there was no recovery whatsoever from his possession. Thereafter he was let off under section 497, Cr.P.C. by police on 3-12-1997. According to the learned counsel, applicant was again arrested on 5-8-2000 on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Imran which statement is said to have been recorded on 31-12-1998. According to learned counsel, the only piece of evidence against the present applicant is in shape of confessional statement of co-accused Imran which cannot form basis of conviction and she has placed reliance on 1993 PCr.LJ 1919. She has further contended that the complainant has been examined before the learned trial Court on 26-4-2001 who has not implicated any of the accused. Learned counsel for the applicant has finally prayed for grant of bail. On the other hand learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed to the grant of bail in view of confessional statement of co-accused Imran which is said to have been recorded on 31-12-1998. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the material available on record. Admittedly the only piece of evidence against the present applicant is in shape of confessional statement of the co- accused Imran which is said to have been recorded on 31-12-1998 and in that statement he has implicated the present applicant and this has not been controverted by learned counsel appearing for the State. Admittedly there is no recovery whatsoever from his possession, even no identification parade of the present applicant has been held on 3-12-1997 he was released by police under section 497, Cr.P.C. and thereafter on 5-8-2000 again he has been arrested .on the basis of confessional statement. I am being fortified by the law reported in 1993 PCr.LJ 1919 wherein D.B. of this Court has held that the confessional statement of co-accused cannot form basis of conviction and this Court has got power to take tentative view and bail has been granted. In view of aforementioned facts, circumstances and law cited by learned counsel for the applicant, particularly when the complainant has not implicated the present applicant. I am of the considered view that at the moment applicant has been able to make out good prima facie case for grant of bail. Accordingly present applicant is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000 (Rupees Two Lacs Only) with P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Criminal Bail Application No. 955 of 2001 stands disposed of. H.B.T./A-272/K Bail granted.