1989SCMR457 (PLP)
IMAM DIN — Petitioner Versus Mst. AISHA alias ASIA — Respondent
| Citation | 1989SCMR457 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | IMAM DIN — Petitioner Versus Mst. AISHA alias ASIA — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code IV of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR457 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code IV of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR457 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR457 (PLP) (IMAM DIN — Petitioner Versus Mst. AISHA alias ASIA — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Sajjad Raza Jafry, Advocate Sureme Court and S. Abid Nawaz Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. .
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 19th July, 1988.
- Syed Sajjad Raza Jafry, Advocate Sureme Court and S. Abid Nawaz Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. .
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment dated 4-6-1988 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench. Multan, in C.R. No.737-D of 1987). ,
S. 115--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)--Leave to appeal grant of Finding of fact--Interference with--Question of paternity--Findings of Trial Court reversed in appeal after re-appraisal of evidence without misreading or ignoring any part of it--High Court declined to interfere in its revisional jurisdiction- Finding of appellate Court not suffering from any infirmity, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑The only question for consideration in this petition for special leave to appeal is whether Mst. Aisha alias Asia was the daughter of Wali Muhammad. Admittedly, her mother, Mst. Batool was married to Wali Muhammad. The case of the petitioner is that she was the daughter of Mst. Batool from another husband. The trial Court accepted the assertion of the petitioner. On appeal the Additional District Judge re‑appraised the evidence, without misreading or ignoring any part of it, and came to the conclusion that Mst. Aisha was the daughter of Wali Muhammad. 1n revisional jurisdiction the High Court declined to interfere with the finding of the learned Additional District Judge. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show that the finding of the learned Additional District Judge suffers from any infirmity. The petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed. M.I./I‑48/S Petition dismissed.