PLC 1979

1979 PLP 90 (PLC)

SIBTE AHMED ZAIDI Versus GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND 2 OTHERS

Jurisdiction / Court
National Industrial Relations Commission
Decided Date
Case No. 4(225) of 1976, decided on 30th September 1978.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1979 PLP 90 (PLC)
Forum / Court National Industrial Relations Commission
Bench Members N/A
Parties SIBTE AHMED ZAIDI Versus GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND 2 OTHERS
Primary Law Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1979 PLP 90 (PLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1979 PLP 90 (PLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1979 PLP 90 (PLC) (SIBTE AHMED ZAIDI Versus GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND 2 OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑

Representation

  • A. Majid, Representative for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 16(1)(d) & 53(4)‑Unfair labour practice by workerSentence- Accused worker indulging in activities subversive of discipline and coercive tactics by letting loose a spate of abusive propaganda and incit ing workers to go slow, such incitement also resulting in tampering with machinery‑Such accused thus guilty of offence of unfair labour prac tice in a grave formAccused already dismissed from service and matter about two and a half years old‑Sentence of six months' imprisonment in circumstances of case, held, would meet ends of justiceAccused also disqualified from holding office in Union. Mahmood A. Ghani, Representative for the Complainant.

Judgment & Decree

GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN AND 2 OTHERS Case No. 4(225) of 1976, decided on 30th September 1978.

Ss. 16(1)(d) & 53(4)‑Unfair labour practice by workerSentence- Accused worker indulging in activities subversive of discipline and coercive tactics by letting loose a spate of abusive propaganda and incit ing workers to go slow, such incitement also resulting in tampering with machinery‑Such accused thus guilty of offence of unfair labour prac tice in a grave formAccused already dismissed from service and matter about two and a half years old‑Sentence of six months' imprisonment in circumstances of case, held, would meet ends of justiceAccused also disqualified from holding office in Union. Mahmood A. Ghani, Representative for the Complainant. A. Majid, Representative for Respondent.