1985 PLP (1) (MLD)
IKRAM ILAHI — Applicant Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRAT and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP (1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Lone, J |
| Parties | IKRAM ILAHI — Applicant Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRAT and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP (1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP (1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Lone, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP (1) (MLD) (IKRAM ILAHI — Applicant Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRAT and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Arshad Mahmood for Respondent No.2.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 24--Transfer of appeal--Allegations levelled by applicant in transfer application proved to be ill-founded--Applicant making unscrupulous and unsuccessful attempts to influence Court where appeal was pending--Transfer application dismissed--Appellate Court, held, was at liberty to assign appeal to other Court working under its jurisdiction, if it felt embarrassment. M. D. Tahir for the Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
Transfer Application No. 519/C of 1984, decided on 9th February, 1985.
S. 24--Transfer of appeal--Allegations levelled by applicant in transfer application proved to be ill-founded--Applicant making unscrupulous and unsuccessful attempts to influence Court where appeal was pending--Transfer application dismissed--Appellate Court, held, was at liberty to assign appeal to other Court working under its jurisdiction, if it felt embarrassment. M. D. Tahir for the Applicant. Ch. Arshad Mahmood for Respondent No.2. From the perusal of the report submitted by the learned District Judge and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I have no doubt that the allegations levelled by the applicant in the transfer application, are utterly ill-founded. This application is liable to be dismissed and I order accordingly. 2. The comments, offered by the learned District Judge, reveal that the applicant, unscrupulously made an unsuccessful attempt 'to influence the learned District Judge. If the learned District Judge feels some embarrassment, in hearing the appeal, he shall be at liberty to assign it, for disposal to some other Additional District Judge, working under his jurisdiction, H. B. T. Application dismissed.