1988 PLP 146 (MLD)
TARIQ alias Papoo Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 146 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | TARIQ alias Papoo Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 146 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 146 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 146 (MLD) (TARIQ alias Papoo Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Abdul Latif for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426--Suspension of sentence--Bail, grant of--Appeal not disposed of despite expiry of statutory period of two years--Sentence suspended and petitioner allowed hail, in circumstances. Sycd Raza Hussain Naqvi for the Complainant. C.M. Latif for the Slate.
Judgment & Decree
Mian Abdul Latif for Petitioner. Sycd Raza Hussain Naqvi for the Complainant. C.M. Latif for the Slate. This is an application for suspension of sentence of Tar 1q alias Papoo who stands convicted under section 302, P.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life vide judgment dated 5-2-1986.
2. Bail is urged on the statutory ground i.e. non-disposal of the appeal within a period of two years of the conviction of the petitioner. It is stated that he was convicted on 5-2-1986 but the appeal has not yet been disposed of.
3. Learned counsel for the State and the complainant have opposed the application on the ground that fatal blow is attributed to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the occurrence was the result of the complainant party's passing drain through the land of the petitioner and thereby causing damage to the haveli and land of the petitioner.
4. Without touching the merits of the case, I suspend the sentence of the petitioner on the ground of non-disposal of the appeal within the statutory period. A He shall be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Thirty thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. S.G.D./T-31/L Bail allowed.