2007 PLP 2987 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD ARIF NAVEED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2987 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Muhammad Najam-uz- Zaman, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ARIF NAVEED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2987 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2987 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Najam-uz- Zaman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2987 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD ARIF NAVEED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Noor Muhammad Awan for Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN MUHAMMAD NAJUM -UZ-ZAMAN, J.
Seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R, No.6512005 dated 4-6-2005 for the offence under sections 420(468(4711 409, P.P.C. read with section 5(2) of P.C.A., 1947 registered at Police Station A.C.E., Circle Faisalabad.
2. Precise allegation against the petitioner as penned in the F.I.R. is [hat in the year 1989 on the basis of fake letter A issued from the offence of Chief Minister, Punjab,' petitioner got job of Assistant Secretary Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education. Thereafter on 4-6-2005 upon the application of Munir Ahmad son of Muhammad Ramzan this case was registered. Petitioner was arrested in this case on 12-10-2005. Bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Faisalabad vide order dated 24-10-2005, hence this petition.
3. After hearing leaded counsel; for the parties at solve length and perusing the record. I have observed that during the investigation petitioner was found innocent and competent authority has recommended for dropping of the proceedings against the petitioner. Even otherwise, the data .available on the record reveals that during three departmental inquiries allegation against the petitioner was found false and it was held that the document on the basis of which petitioner got job was genuine document. In the light of the said circumstances petitioner is entitled for the concession of bail. Accordingly this petition is allowed C and petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds amounting to Rs.50,000 (rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of D.R. (Judicial) of this Bench. N.H.Q./M-12/L Bail granted.