1989SCMR1704 (PLP)
MUHAMMAD ZUBAID and others Petitioners Versus NATHEY KHAN and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR1704 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ZUBAID and others Petitioners Versus NATHEY KHAN and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 19(18) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR1704 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 19(18) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR1704 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR1704 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ZUBAID and others Petitioners Versus NATHEY KHAN and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A.Qureshi; Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in Criminal Original No.13 of 1980).
- K.L.Kardar, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on Record for Petitioners (in C.P.L.A. No.714 of 1983).
- Nemo for Respondents (in both Cases)
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 14‑3‑1983, in R.A.No. 11/C/83, in C.R.No. 1185 of 1981.) ‑‑‑S.11‑‑Res judicata‑‑Case stood concluded by a finding by all the Courts below that suit was barred by res judicata‑‑Facts stated by petitioners regarding earlier litigation supported the view‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.11‑‑Res judicata‑‑Case stood concluded by a finding by all the Courts below that suit was barred by res judicata‑‑Facts stated by petitioners regarding earlier litigation supported the view‑‑Leave to appeal refused. M.A.Qureshi; Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in Criminal Original No.13 of 1980). K.L.Kardar, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on Record for Petitioners (in C.P.L.A. No.714 of 1983). Nemo for Respondents (in both Cases) MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, ,J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by a plaintiff side against the dismissal of their Civil Revision by the High Court. It had arisen out of a suit for administration, which also involved the related question of petitioners' right to inherit the property of Faiz Muhammad! Who died in 1950. The case now stands concluded by a finding by all the learned Courts below that the present suit was barred by res judicata. The facts stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners regarding the earlier litigation support the decision with regard to res judicata. That being so, leave to appeal is refused. The contempt application, having not been pressed, is also dismissed M.A.K./M‑941/S Leave refused.