2009 PLP 357 (PLC)
BAYRAM AVARI Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9, MULTAN and another
| Citation | 2009 PLP 357 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Raja Muhammad Shafqat Khan Abbasi, J |
| Parties | BAYRAM AVARI Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9, MULTAN and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 357 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 357 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Raja Muhammad Shafqat Khan Abbasi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 357 (PLC) (BAYRAM AVARI Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.9, MULTAN and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 48
Employer had called in question order passed by Labour Court, whereby petition by employee had been allowed
Labour Appellate Tribunal having been constituted in terms of S.55 of Industrial Relations Act, 2008, it was appropriate that employer should approach the relevant forum
High Court, instead of adjourning the case, disposed of the same-with the direction to the employer to file an appeal before Labour Appellate Tribunal within specified period
Operation of the impugned order would remain suspended to enable the employer to approach relevant forum.
Judgment & Decree
RAJA MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT KHAN ABBASI, J.
Through this appeal, the appellant has called in question the order, dated 29-11-2008 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.IX, Multan (respondent No.1), whereby petition under section 48 of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 filed by respondent No.2 had been allowed.
2. It has been noticed that Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal has been constituted in terms of section 55 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008.
3. In view of this situation, it is appropriate that the appellant should approach the relevant forum. Instead of adjourning the case, I propose to dispose of the same with the direction to the appellant to file an appeal before Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal within twenty days. However, operation of the impugned order, dated 29-11-2008 shall remain suspended till 5-7-2009 to enable the appellant to approach the relevant forum.
4. Disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./B-44/L Order accordingly.