2015 PLP 361 (GBLR)
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Petitioners Versus MERA JAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2015 PLP 361 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Petitioners Versus MERA JAN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 361 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 361 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 361 (GBLR) (PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others — Petitioners Versus MERA JAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Advocate Gilgit-Balstistan along with Ali Nazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Amjad Hussain, Advocate along with Johar Ali Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- In view of the above, the learned counsel contends that the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4, may decide the case of the respondents in pursuance of the policy available for recruitment. The learned advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan has luke warmly agreed to remand the case and the respondents may approach the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 for redressal of their grievances in accordance with law.
- In view of the above discussion, we direct the petitioners Nos.2 to 4 to decide the case of the respondents independently in accordance with the "Recruitment Policy" and law on merits, within a period of three (03) months. The copy of this order be supplied to learned Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan.
Headnotes / Summary
Writ petition of candidates was allowed by the Chief Court and authorities were directed to adjust the petitioners against the posts of Nursing Assistants in the Health Department according to the recruitment policy
Authorities were directed by the Supreme Appellate Court to decide the case in accordance with the "recruitment policy" and law on merits within a period of three months.
Judgment & Decree
DR. RANA MUHAMMAD SHAMIM, C.J.
Mr. Amjad Hussain learned counsel for the respondents has drawn the attention of this Court at the last Para of the Impugned Judgment in Writ Petition No. 61/2009, dated 05.12.2012, passed by the learned Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan. Which is re-produced as under:- Quoted:-. "In the circumstance, we allow this petition; respondents are directed to adjust the petitioners against the posts of Nursing Assistants in the Health Department of District Diamer according to the Policy available for recruitment". Unquoted:- In view of the above, the learned counsel contends that the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4, may decide the case of the respondents in pursuance of the policy available for recruitment. The learned advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan has luke warmly agreed to remand the case and the respondents may approach the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 for redressal of their grievances in accordance with law. In view of the above discussion, we direct the petitioners Nos.2 to 4 to decide the case of the respondents independently in accordance with the "Recruitment Policy" and law on merits, within a period of three (03) months. The copy of this order be supplied to learned Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan. The petition is disposed off in above terms. HBT/224/GB Order accordingly.