2006 P Cr (PLP)
KHURSHID ALI and 9 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | KHURSHID ALI and 9 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (KHURSHID ALI and 9 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Asghar Ali Gill for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.379, 386, 337-H(2), 148 & 149
Prosecution story narrated in F.I.R., showed that deadly weapons were used' in commission of offence, though nobody had received any injury in the incident
Specific role had been assigned to three accused persons who had failed to point out any material or mala fides with complainant and police to falsely involve them in the case
Recovery of crime weapons and property, was yet to be made
Said accused, in circumstances were not entitled to concession of bail
Bail petition to the extent of said accused, was dismissed.
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.379, 386, 337-H(2), 148 & 149
General allegation was against few accused persons and they had not committed offence alleged against them in tentative assessment
Judgment & Decree
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J.
The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.310, dated 10-7-2005 registered under sections 379/386/337-H(2)/148/149, P.P.C. with Police Station Sharaqpur District Sheikhupura on the grounds that the petitioners have falsely been involved in the instant case with mala fide intention of the complainant and the police in order to disgrace and humiliate them.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant assisted by the State opposed the prayer for confirmation of pre-arrest bail.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. According to the prosecution story narrated in the F.I.R., deadly weapons were used in the commission of offence. However, nobody received any injury in the incident. Specific role has been assigned to Khurshid Ali, Shahid Ali and Hussain Haider, petitioners Nos.1, 3 and
9. They have failed to point out any material or mala fide with the complainant and the police to falsely involve them in the present case. Recovery of crime-weapons and property is yet to be made. They are thus, not entitled to concession of bail. Their petition is dismissed.
5. As far remaining petitioners, there is general allegation against them. It appears that they have not committed the offence alleged against them in my tentative assessment. Their petition is thus, allowed subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./K-139/L Order accordingly.