1990 PLP 326 (SCMR)
TAHIR HASSAN HASHMI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1990 PLP 326 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | TAHIR HASSAN HASHMI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 326 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 326 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 326 (SCMR) (TAHIR HASSAN HASHMI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Pervaiz Akhtar, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 26th September, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 31st July, 1989 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.869/B of 1989). ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1800), S. 302/307/148/149‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Contention that petitioner's case was distinguishable from that of principal accused as he had only caused simple incised injuries on non‑vital part of body of deceased‑‑‑Name of accused petitioner was not only mentioned in F.I.R. but specific role was also ascribed to him therein‑‑‑No case, held, was made out for grant of bail‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 26th September, 1989. JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑This is a bail matter and. the petition for leave to appeal is directed against order of the Lahore High Court,: Lahore dated 31st July, 1989 whereby petition for bail of the petitioner was rejected. A case is registered against the petitioner alongwith others under section 302/307/148/149, P.P.C. at Police Station Multan Cantt. The part attributed to him is that he caused two injuries on left upper arm of the deceased with a dagger whereas his co‑accused caused injury with a similar weapon in the chest of the deceased which had proved fatal. The incident occurred in Nishtar Medical College, Multan. Learned counsel for the petitioner attempted to argue that the case of the petitioner is distinguishable from that of the principal accused as he only caused simple incised injuries on non‑vital part of the body of the deceased. In the light of what has been stated in the FIR which not only names the petitioner but also ascribes specific part to him, no case is made out for grant of Jail. The petition is accordingly dismissed. N.H.Q./T‑56/S Petition dismissed.