1989 PLP 1384 (SCMR)
ZAKAULLAH and others Petitioners Versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, PAKISTAN and 2
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1384 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zillah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ZAKAULLAH and others Petitioners Versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, PAKISTAN and 2 |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1384 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1384 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zillah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1384 (SCMR) (ZAKAULLAH and others Petitioners Versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, PAKISTAN and 2). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Yaqoob Sindhu, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Aslam Ch. Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Tanvir Ahmad, Addl. A.‑G. Punjab and S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th August, 1988.
- MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Reliance has been placed on the orders granting leave to appeal, dated 13‑12‑1976 in C.P. 240/R of 1976 and C.P. 246/R of 1976. Both the learned counsel state that the facts and circumstances this and the aforenoticed cases are similar. Therefore, leave to appeal is also granted in this petition and it is converted into an appeal so as to enable the office to fix it for hearing with the two Civil Appeals Nos.292 and 293 of 1976 arising out of the said petitions. They, according to the learned Additional Advocate General, were fixed for hearing on 26‑6‑1988 at Rawalpindi but were not disposed of.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 29‑10‑1983 in W.P. No.467 of 1974). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Facts and circumstances of the case were similar to the cases where leave to appeal had been granted‑‑Petition was ordered to be converted into appeal to be heard with the appeals referred by the petitioner. C.P. 240/R of 1976 and C.P. 246/R of 1976 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Reliance has been placed on the orders granting leave to appeal, dated 13‑12‑1976 in C.P. 240/R of 1976 and C.P. 246/R of 1976. Both the learned counsel state that the facts and circumstances this and the aforenoticed cases are similar. Therefore, leave to appeal is also granted in this petition and it is converted into an appeal so as to enable the office to fix it for hearing with the two Civil Appeals Nos.292 and 293 of 1976 arising out of the said petitions. They, according to the learned Additional Advocate General, were fixed for hearing on 26‑6‑1988 at Rawalpindi but were not disposed of. Security Rs.5,
000. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties to file all necessary additional documents. Stay to continue. To be heard with the aforenoted two appeals. M.B.A./Z‑56/S Leave granted.