2009 PLP 1110 (YLR)
SHAFAQAT HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents
| Citation | 2009 PLP 1110 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman, J |
| Parties | SHAFAQAT HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1110 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1110 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1110 (YLR) (SHAFAQAT HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----S. 497---Prevention and Control of Human Trafficking Ordinance (LIX of 2002), Ss.3/4---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Ss.17/22-Bail, grant of---Counsel for accused, on the last date of hearing, made an offer that accused was ready to pay half of the disputed amount and the remaining amount would be paid, if prosecution would succeed in proving case against accused before the Trial Court---Said offer was accepted by the counsel for complainant---In view of said undertaking, complainant had received half of the disputed amount---Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances.
- Nasim Sabir Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Agha I.A. Irnran for the Complainant. Muhammad Zubair Khalid, Standing Counsel.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN MUHAMMAD NAJAM -UZ-ZAMAN, J.
Seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 1264/2008 dated 18-10-2008 for the offence under section 17/22 of E.O. 1979 and sections 3/4 of HTO, 2002 registered at Police Station FIA, P.C. Gujranwala, on the ground of compromise between the parties.
2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner made an offer that petitioner is ready to pay half of the disputed amount and the remaining amount would be paid if prosecution succeeds in proving case against the petitioner before the trial Court. This offer was accepted by the counsel for complainant. In view of the said undertaking today complainant of this case namely Tabassum Hussain son of Muhammad Hussain holder of CNIC No. 34201-5586204-L (Photostat copy of the CNIC has been placed on record) has received behalf of the disputed amount i.e. Rs.150,000 (Rupees One Hundred and Fifty Thousand only).
3. For the said reasons, this petition is allowed and petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds amounting to Rs.100,000 (rupees one lac) with one surety in the amount to the satisfaction of D.R. (Judicial) of this Court. It is made clear that in case petitioner stands convicted by the trial Court he shall pay the remaining amount i.e. Rs.150,000 to the complainant and on the other hand complainant would be responsible for the return of the amount received by him today, in case of acquittal of the petitioner from the charge. H.B.T./S-47/L Bail granted.