1988 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD BASHIR and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD BASHIR and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD BASHIR and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Jamshed Ali for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 148 & 149‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Both sides received injuries‑‑Complainant party had also been challaned in a counter case under Ss.304, 148 & 149, Penal Code, and accused of that case were on bail‑‑Investigating Officer reported that complainant party was in fact aggressor and two accused against whom allegations were almost identical had already been released on bail by the High Court‑‑Accused also admitted to bail. Sami Ullah Khan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Syed Jamshed Ali for Petitioners. Sami Ullah Khan for the State. This is an application for grant of bail to Muhammad Bashir and Muhammad Younas, petitioners in the case under sections 302, 148, 149, P.P.C. registered at P . S . Saddar, Sheikhupura vide F . I . R. No. 583, dated 6‑11‑1986,
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners and three others in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Jaffar Iqbal on 6‑11‑1986 in the area of Mouza Bhikki of P.S. Saddar Sheikhupura.
3. As for the petitioners, it has been alleged that Muhammad Bashir was armed with Dattar and Sadiq with Dagger and they caused injuries on the head and chest of the deceased respectively.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co‑accused namely Sadiq and Abbas against whom the allegations are identical, have already been released on bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the state has opposed this application on the ground that the petitioners have inflicted injuries on the head and chest of the deceased.
5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that during the occurrence both the side received injuries. On the side of the complainant, Jaffar Iqbal lost life while on the side of the petitioner/ accused three persons namely Muhammad Bashir, Muhammad Younas, petitioners and Muhammad Sadiq co‑accused received fire‑arm wounds and injuries with sharp‑edged weapons; that the complainant party has also been challaned in a counter‑case under section 307/148/149, P.P.C. and the accused of that case are on bail, that according to the two Investigating Officers, the complainant party was in fact the aggressor and that the two accused namely Muhammad Sadiq and Abbas against whom the allegations are almost identical, have already been released on bail by this Court.
6. For what has been said above, the petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. /Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura. M.Y.H./M‑721/L Bail granted.