1988 PLP 52 (MLD)
RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 52 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 52 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 52 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 52 (MLD) (RIAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Dr. Khalid Ranjha for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Bail, grant of--Complainant not aware of facts of case, making report as Lambardar--Eye-witnesses named in F.I.R. resiling--Statements recorded under S. 164, Cr.P.C. placed on record--Bail allowed in circumstances. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
The complainant has entered appearance and states that no doubt, he had lodged the first information report but he had done so because he was a Lambardar, otherwise, he is not aware of the facts of the case. The eye-witnesses named in the FIR have also resiled and their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. have been attached with this petition. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is entitled to the grant of bail. Accordingly, I direct that the petitioner A shall be released on bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Chiniot. SA./R-53/L. Bail allowed,