1975 PLP 187 (SCMR)
ABDULLAH alias DULLA AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
| Citation | 1975 PLP 187 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDULLAH alias DULLA AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1975 PLP 187 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1975 PLP 187 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1975 PLP 187 (SCMR) (ABDULLAH alias DULLA AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. M. Abdus Salam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by 1qbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing : 9th January 1975.
- Ch. M. Abdus Salam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by 1qbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court, dated the 12th November 1974, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4312-B of 1974).
S. 302-Triple murder-Eight persons, allegedly acting in concert, killing three persons one after another at three different places-A and S although not attributed fatal injuries delivered to accused yet bail refused by Supreme Court in view of fact of inquiry proceedings being still pending. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J.‑‑The two petitioners alongwith six other persons are facing inquiry before a Magistrate in respect of offences under section 302/452/148/149 of the Pakistan Penal Code registered on the 12th of March 1974. The allegations against them are that all of them in a body came armed with a pistol, a gun and gangs and raised lalkara that they had come to avenge the murder of one Jhalla and thereafter two of them Sukha and Bashir fired at and killed Jealla. Then they went to another place where Allah Yar, son of Jhalla was present and there again after all of them had raised lalkara co‑accused Bashir and Sukha shot and killed Allah Yar. All the accused including the two petitioners thereafter went to a third place where Hidayat another son of Jhalla was taking bath and there again the six accused persons including the two petitioners raised lalkara and co- accused Bashir and Sukha shot and killed Hidayat. The circumstances disclosed so far show that all the accused persons acted together and the mere fact that the fatal injuries had been attributed to co‑accused Bashir and Sukha only will not at this stage be of any relevance for the purpose of releasing the petitioners on bail on the ground that they did not share the common intention in the matter of killing the three deceased persons particularly when the inquiry proceeding is still continuing. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Leave refused.