2009 PLP 56 (YLR)
SHAHID and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 56 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J |
| Parties | SHAHID and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 56 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 56 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 56 (YLR) (SHAHID and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Asstt. Advocate-General Sindh.
- On the other hand, Mr. Muhammad Igbal Mahar, learned Assistant Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State, has frankly conceded to the grant of bail in view of the unreported case of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan referred to above.
- I have heard the arguments of Mr. Irshad Hussain Dharejo, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, learned Assistant Advocate General Sindh for the State and with their assistance, I have also gone through material placed on record.
- Keeping in view the no objection extended by the learned Assistant Advocate General and U.C. of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan cited by the learned Counsel in support of his above contention, in which, on identical facts and circumstances, bail was granted to an accused, I allow this Application and grant bail to the applicants subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.500,000 (Rs. five lac only) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
State Counsel had conceded to the grant of bail, in view of no objection extended by State Counsel bail was granted to accused. Criminal Petition No. 105-K of 2002 rel. Irshad Hussain Dharejo for Applicants. Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Asstt. Advocate-General Sindh.
Judgment & Decree
FARRUKH ZIA G. SHAIKH, J.
Applicants Shahid and Razak have filed this Application under sections 497/498 Cr.P.C. seeking bail, who are required in F.I.R. Crime No.11 of 2008 registered at Police Station, Kumb, District Khairpur for offence under sections 302, 34, P.P.C. In brief, the facts are that the case was initiated on an F.I.R. lodged by Complainant Muhammad Ashfaq Arain on 25-8-2008 alleging therein that on 20-8-2008 he along with his brother Riaz alias Ranjho, cousin Muhammad Ishaque and relative Naveed left their village for the festival (Melia) of Qalander Shahbaz and they made pilgrimages. After few days viz. on 28-8-2008 at sun-set time, the Complainant along with above named P.Ws. and his brother Muhammad Riaz alias Ranjho was standing together when accused namely Liaquat, Shafiq, Shahid (Applicant), Ghulam Hussain alias Kali and Razak (Applicant) had also come for pilgrimage. They asked Complainant's brother Muhammad Riaz to go with them for walking at, the road; hence his brother accompanied them and, thereafter, the Complainant party went to road. At about 8-p.m. they heard the cries of Muhammad Riaz alias Ranjho, on which, Complainant party went running there and saw the accused Shafiq, Kamboh, Shahid (Applicant) and Ghulam Hussain alias Kaloo caught hold of Complainant's brother Muhammad Riaz from his legs and arms and fell him down. Accused Liaqat who had knife in his hand, was cutting the throat of Muhammad Riaz while Razak (applicant) instigated other accused to murder him. Complainant party raised cries and accosted to refrain from murdering the person then the accused fled away. Complainant party went and saw that Muhammad Riaz was struggling on the ground and his throat was cut and was bleeding profusely and he had cut mark on the right side of cheek from which blood was oozing and within their sight he succumbed to his injuries. Hence the F.I.R. was lodged. Mr. Irshad Hussain Dharejo, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants has contended that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity, which is admitted in the F.I.R. He has argued that the applicants were arrested on the next day of the incident. He has also argued that the police during the investigation let off the applicants/accused by showing their names in Column-2 of the Challan, but, subsequently, under the orders of Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate-II, Kotdiji, they were challaned and sent-up to face their trial in this case. In support of above contentions, he has cited an unreported case of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Criminal Petition No.105-K of 2002 wherein, on similar facts and circumstances, bail was granted to an accused on 11-12-2002. On the other hand, Mr. Muhammad Igbal Mahar, learned Assistant Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State, has frankly conceded to the grant of bail in view of the unreported case of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan referred to above. I have heard the arguments of Mr. Irshad Hussain Dharejo, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, learned Assistant Advocate General Sindh for the State and with their assistance, I have also gone through material placed on record. Keeping in view the no objection extended by the learned Assistant Advocate General and U.C. of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan cited by the learned Counsel in support of his above contention, in which, on identical facts and circumstances, bail was granted to an accused, I allow this Application and grant bail to the applicants subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.500,000 (Rs. five lac only) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Application stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./S-101/K Bail granted.