1989 PLP 325 (SCMR)
SARDAR BEGUM and others Petitioners Versus SETTLEIMENT COMMISSIONER and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 325 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Majaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ: |
| Parties | SARDAR BEGUM and others Petitioners Versus SETTLEIMENT COMMISSIONER and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Rehabilitation and Settlment Scheme |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 325 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Rehabilitation and Settlment Scheme as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 325 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Majaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ:.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 325 (SCMR) (SARDAR BEGUM and others Petitioners Versus SETTLEIMENT COMMISSIONER and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Abdullah, Advocate Supreme. Court for Petitioners.
- Sh. Salahud Din, Advocate-on-Record and Ch. Muhammad Nazir, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No. I.
- Date of hearing: 19th .July, 1988.
- Sh. Salahud Din, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ch. Muhammad Nazir, Advocate Supreme Courtt for Respondent No. I.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Labor, High Court dated 30-5-1982 in W.P. No. 165.-R-81).
Chaps. I & II, para. 7--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973). Art 185(3) Leave to appeal granted to consider whetherer, inter alia, case of petitioners was fully covered by para. 7 of Chap. 1, Part 11 of Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme and that High Court did not advert to this legal aspect.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Chaps. I & II, para. 7‑‑Constitution of Pakistan, 1973). Art 185(3) Leave to appeal granted to consider whetherer, inter alia, case of petitioners was fully covered by para. 7 of Chap. 1, Part 11 of Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme and that High Court did not advert to this legal aspect. Ch. Muhammad Abdullah, Advocate Supreme. Court for Petitioners. Sh. Salahud Din, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ch. Muhammad Nazir, Advocate Supreme Courtt for Respondent No. I. Date of hearing: 19th .July, 1988. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Contends, inter alia, that case of petitioner, is fully covered by para. 7 of Chapter I Part II of tile Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme under the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, the High Court did not advert to this legal aspect. The contention needs examination. We accordingly grant leave. to appeal against the judgment of Lahore High Court dated 30‑5‑1082. Security Rs. 5,
000. Appeal to he made ready on the present record The parties if they so wish may file additional documents within two months. Interim order dated 7‑2‑1983 shall continue. M Y.H./S‑200/S Leave granted.