Register
SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR)

Mst. AKHTAR SULTANA and others Petitioners Versus Mst. KARAM BIB1 and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 787 of 1981, decided on 10th July, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties Mst. AKHTAR SULTANA and others Petitioners Versus Mst. KARAM BIB1 and others‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR) (Mst. AKHTAR SULTANA and others Petitioners Versus Mst. KARAM BIB1 and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)

Representation

  • A. R. Shaukat, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Oureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 10th July, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment of Lahore High Court dated 5‑5‑1981 in L.P.A. No.213 of 1967). ‑‑‑S.10‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Finding; of fact‑‑Property in dispute was found indivisible by the Settlement Commissioner‑‑Finding was one of fact, High Court, held, rightly declined to interfere.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑We don't think the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 5‑5‑1981 against which Mst. Akhtar Sultana and others have riled this petition for leave to appeal is open to any exception. The property which is a residential House No. P‑20, Khalsa College, Faisalabad was found by the Settlement Commissioner to be indivisible.This was a finding of fact and the High Court rightly declined to interfere with it. Karam Bibi respondent claimed transfer in her own right whereas the other party claimed transfer on the strength of possession of Dilawar Ali Shah father of petitioners 1 to

3. This is not a fit case for leave to appeal. Dismissed. M.A.K./A‑543/S Petition dismissed.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: SCMR
  • Volume Year: 1989
  • Citation Ref: 1989 PLP 1773 (SCMR)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1989SCMR568 MUHAMMAD BOOTA‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. AMANAT BIBI‑‑Respondent
  • 1989SCMR567 NOOR KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ALAM KHATOON‑‑Respondent
  • 1989SCMR566 ZAHOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL GHAFOOR and others‑‑Respondents
  • 1989SCMR565 MUHAMMAD AMIR‑‑Petitioner Versus NOOR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents
  • 1989SCMR561 ABDUL GHAFFAR QURESHI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
  • 1989SCMR560 Messrs KHAN BROS. & CO.. — Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAHNAZ BEGUM and another — Respondents