PCRLJ 2008

2008 P Cr (PLP)

QADIR BUX alias KARO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2007-July-25
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties QADIR BUX alias KARO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 P Cr (PLP) (QADIR BUX alias KARO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.--- The learned advocate for the applicants has stated that the police during the investigation did not find any tangible evidence against the applicants, therefore, they were released, but the trial Court vide order dated 3-11-2004 has joined them as accused persons and has issued non-bailable warrants for their arrest; that the applicants wanted to appear before the trial Court and surrender themselves but they could not do so, as the police were following them to arrest them, therefore, learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that protective bail may be granted so that the applicants may surrender before the trial Court.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, ,324, 337-A(ii), 337-F(i), 114, 147, 148 & 149

Protective bail, grant of

Police during investigation did not find any tangible evidence against accused--Accused were released, but the Trial Court had joined them as accused and had issued non-bailable warrants for their arrest

Accused wanted to appear before the Trial Court and surrender themselves, but they could not do so as the police were following them for arrest

Accused had stated that protective bail could be granted to them so that they could surrender before the Trial Court

Protective bail, was granted to accused, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.

The learned advocate for the applicants has stated that the police during the investigation did not find any tangible evidence against the applicants, therefore, they were released, but the trial Court vide order dated 3-11-2004 has joined them as accused persons and has issued non-bailable warrants for their arrest; that the applicants wanted to appear before the trial Court and surrender themselves but they could not do so, as the police were following them to arrest them, therefore, learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that protective bail may be granted so that the applicants may surrender before the trial Court. In the circumstances, without touching the merits of the case, protective bail is granted to the applicants in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) each on furnishing solvent surety with P.R bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. This order will cease to operate on 1-8-2007 or when the Applicants surrender before the Court whichever is earlier. The application is disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./Q-11/K Bail granted.