1991 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 203-DD
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.20
Order of conviction war passed by Additional Sessions Judge under provisions of Hudood Ordinance
Appeal would lie before Federal Shariat Court and not before' High Court.
Judgment & Decree
Art. 203-DD
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.20
Order of conviction war passed by Additional Sessions Judge under provisions of Hudood Ordinance
Appeal would lie before Federal Shariat Court and not before' High Court. Nemo for Appellant. Kh. Hafeez Ullah for the State. Date of hearing: 24th April, 1991. Muhammad Iftikhar appellant, was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sargodha, under section 20 of the Offences Against Property Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. He was convicted under this section and sentenced to ten years' R.I. and a fine of Rs.500 or in default thereof six months' R.I. on 12-7-1980. Feeling aggrieved thereby he has filed the present appeal.
2. I am afraid, under Article 203-DD of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. after 27th May, 1980, the appeal against the orders passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judges/Sessions Judges in Hudood Ordinance cases lies before the Federal Shariat Court and not before this Court. So the present appeal, which was filed on 26-8-1980 against an order passed in Hudood case on 12-7-1980 is not entertainable by this Court. It is, therefore, disposed of as not `maintainable'.
3. The appellant has been released on bail by this Court. The trial Court will issue warrants for the arrest of Muhammad Iftikhar appellant and will send him to jail to reserve the remaining sentence. SA./M-2954/L Appeal dismissed.