1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA RANGE,
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA RANGE, |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA RANGE,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Riaz for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 4th September, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil servant, who joined Police Department, earlier was promoted as officiating S.I. Police and was confirmed as such in that rank-- Civil servant was subsequently admitted to list F and was promoted as Inspector
Application of civil servant for ante-dating his entry and promotion as officiating S.I. Police on basis of encounter with notorious out-laws was accepted by D.I.-G. Police, but Additional Inspector-General of Police, not only rejected case for ante-dating admission to list `F but also cancelled order of D.I.-G. Police passed on application of civil servant
Gallantry performance given by civil servant at the risk of his life alongwith others, had not been denied
Various officers who performed gallantry services admittedly were -rewarded with accelerated promotion
Civil servant thus was rightly promoted and his application for ante-dating his entry, was rightly accepted by D.I.-G. Police
Order of Additional Inspector-General of Police rejecting case of civil servant for ante-dating admission and cancelling order of D.I.-G. Police, not being in accordance with law, was set aside by Service Tribunal and order passed by D.I.-G. Police was restored.
Judgment & Decree
GUJRANWALA and another Appeal No. 90/201 of 1987, decided on 22nd September, 1990. Civil service
Civil servant, who joined Police Department, earlier was promoted as officiating S.I. Police and was confirmed as such in that rank-- Civil servant was subsequently admitted to list F and was promoted as Inspector
Application of civil servant for ante-dating his entry and promotion as officiating S.I. Police on basis of encounter with notorious out-laws was accepted by D.I.-G. Police, but Additional Inspector-General of Police, not only rejected case for ante-dating admission to list `F but also cancelled order of D.I.-G. Police passed on application of civil servant
Gallantry performance given by civil servant at the risk of his life alongwith others, had not been denied
Various officers who performed gallantry services admittedly were -rewarded with accelerated promotion
Civil servant thus was rightly promoted and his application for ante-dating his entry, was rightly accepted by D.I.-G. Police
Order of Additional Inspector-General of Police rejecting case of civil servant for ante-dating admission and cancelling order of D.I.-G. Police, not being in accordance with law, was set aside by Service Tribunal and order passed by D.I.-G. Police was restored. M.A. Riaz for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 4th September, 1990.