1986 PLP 1112 (SCMR)
Syed HASAN HAMID — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1112 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ |
| Parties | Syed HASAN HAMID — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1112 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1112 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1112 (SCMR) (Syed HASAN HAMID — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Ijaz Hussain Batalvi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhter Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 5th April, 1986.
- S.M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ijaz Hussain Batalvi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhter Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3/Q of 1985, dated 8th February, 1986).
Art. 185(3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Petition for leave to appeal against order of High Court dismissing application of petitioner for quashing of a criminal case arising out of a matrimonial dispute--Parties compromising matter out of Court and compromise deed signed by both parties placed on record--Petition converted into appeal and matter disposed of finally by allowing appeal in terms of compromise.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, dated 8‑2‑1986, dismissing his application under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C., for quashment of a criminal case arising out of' a matrimonial dispute.
2. After hearing each others' arguments and the observations of the Court, the learned counsel for the parties sought a short adjournment till 11‑30 a. m. to seek instructions from their respective clients regarding the possibility of a compromise. After the interval at 11‑30 a.m. the counsel for the parties informed us that the parties have compromised the matter out of Court. The compromise deed, signed by both the parties as well as their learned counsel, is placed on the record.
3. Consequently we convert the petition into an appeal and dispose of the matter finally by allowing the appeal in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties which have been mentioned in the compromise deed. M . Y . H Appeal allowed