2001 PLP 1715 (YLR)
PERVAIZ ASLAM and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1715 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Zafar Pasha Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | PERVAIZ ASLAM and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1715 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1715 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Zafar Pasha Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1715 (YLR) (PERVAIZ ASLAM and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- N.A. Butt for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 379 & 381
No recovery of any stolen document was effected from the accused who was a Government servant and did not have any previous criminal record-- Investigation was in progress and it was not known as to how long it would take to conclude
Registers maintained by the co -accused as stamp vendor though had been recovered from him, but no stamp papers which were incriminating documents, had been recovered
Both the accused and co accused were granted bail. Muhammad Shafi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 379 & 381
No recovery of any stolen document was effected from the accused who was a Government servant and did not have any previous criminal record-- Investigation was in progress and it was not known as to how long it would take to conclude
Registers maintained by the co -accused as stamp vendor though had been recovered from him, but no stamp papers which were incriminating documents, had been recovered
Both the accused and co accused were granted bail. N.A. Butt for Petitioner. Muhammad Shafi for the State. This order will dispose of Criminal Miscellaneous No.1062-B of 2001 and Criminal Miscellaneous No.1074-B of 2001 respectively filed by Pervaiz Aslam and Muhammad Rafiq petitioners.
2. It is argued that certain forged documents were allegedly stolen by the petitioner Pervaiz Aslam in order to screen and subvert evidence against Abdul Hameed, former M.N.A. According to learned counsel no recovery of any stolen document was effected from him. He is in judicial lock-up. He is a Government servant and does not have any previous criminal record. The investigation is in progress and it is not known how long it will take to conclude the name. The petitioner being a Government servant and no recovery has been effected from him deserve as concession of bail.
3. As regard petitioner Muhammad Rafiq, it is alleged that the registers maintained by him as Stamp Vendor have been recovered from him but no stamp papers which are incriminating documents have been recovered from him.
4. In view of what has been observed above, both the petitioners are admitted to bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
5. In case the concession is mis-used, the same may be withdrawn and cancelled by the learned trial Court. H.B.T./P-53/L Bail granted.