PLC(CS) 2014

2014 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Dr. MANZOOR AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore and 3 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.3806 of 2013, decided on 6th May, 2013.
Honorable Judges
Shoaib Saeed, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2014 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Shoaib Saeed, J
Parties Dr. MANZOOR AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore and 3 others
Primary Law Punjab Civil Service Rules
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2014 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Civil Service Rules as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2014 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Shoaib Saeed, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2014 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Dr. MANZOOR AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore and 3 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Civil Service Rules

Representation

  • Malik Muhammad Zafar Iqbal for Petitioner.
  • Mehr Nazar Abbas Chawan, A.A.-G. for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

R.7.2

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199

Constitutional petition

Salary of government servant under suspension

Entitlement of salary of such employee

Scope

Petitioner was denied the salary during suspension

Validity

Government servant under suspension shall remain entitled to the pay and allowances that he was drawing immediately before his suspension

Department was directed to make arrangements of arrears of salaries of the petitioner as well as regular payment of future salary

Constitutional petition was allowed.

Judgment & Decree

SHOAIB SAEED, J.

Through this writ petition the petitioner has prayed that respondents be directed to make the payment of the arrears of the salaries of the petitioner outstanding against them and regular payment of future salary may also be ordered.

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was serving as Cotton Inspector Agriculture (Ext.) BS-17 at Kabirwala, District Khanewal and he was placed under suspension vide order dated 17-9-2012 passed by the Secretary to Government of the Punjab Agriculture Department, Lahore. He was directed to join the office of the Executive District Officer Agriculture Multan. He was working there and was drawing his salary from District Accounts Office, Khanewal. Respondent No.1 transferred one Qasir Abbas Cotton Inspector from Jahanian to the post of Cotton Inspector in the office of respondent No.3 vide order dated 28-2-2013. Respondent No.4 after the transfer of said Qasir Abbas stopped the salary of the petitioner. The petitioner approached respondent No.4 and requested him to release his salary on the ground that he is not competent to stop his salary but he refused to release the same, hence this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondent No.4 is not competent authority to stop the salary of the petitioner and as per Punjab Civil Service Rules and Finance Department Government of Punjab Notification No.FD(FR) VI-17/93 dated 26-9-1993, rule 7.2 a Government servant under suspension shall remain entitled to the pay and allowance that he is drawing immediately before his suspension.

4. Conversely, learned counsel for the respondents has controverted the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He contends that there is one post of Cotton Inspector (BS-17) in Tehsil Kabirwala and District Government has provided funds for one post under head Cotton Control Act. Consequent upon posting of Mr.Qasir Abbas predecessor of petitioner only one officer could draw pay from the allocated funds. Therefore, the pay of the petitioner was legally stopped by Deputy District Officer Agriculture (Extension) Kabirwala.

5. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and examined the case-law.

6. Admittedly, the petitioner was serving as Cotton Inspector and now he is placed under suspension. As per Punjab Civil Service Rules and Finance Department Government of Punjab Notification No. FD(FR) VI-17/93 dated 26-9-1993 rule 7.2 a Government servant under suspension shall remain entitled to the pay and allowances that he is drawing immediately before his suspension. Learned counsel for the respondents has failed to controvert the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to make arrangement of arrears of salaries of the petitioner as well as regular payment of future salary. JJK/m-229/L Petition allowed.