2005 PLP 3215 (YLR)
MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent.
| Citation | 2005 PLP 3215 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Rahmat Hussain Jafferi, J |
| Parties | MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent. |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 3215 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 3215 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Rahmat Hussain Jafferi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 3215 (YLR) (MIR MUHAMMAD and 4 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.---The learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that if the trial Court records the evidence of main witnesses within a period of two months then he would not press the bail application at this stage.
Headnotes / Summary
Ghulam Shabbir Shar for Applicants. Muhammad Mahmood Khan Yousifi, A.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.
The learned Advocate for the applicants has stated that if the trial Court records the evidence of main witnesses within a period of two months then he would not press the bail application at this stage. From the record it appears that some of the accused are still absconders. The trial Court is directed to separate the case of accused who are absconders and then proceed with the case against the remaining accused by framing the charge after compliance of section 265-C, Cr.P.C. and then record the evidence of material witnesses within the above mentioned period. After recording the evidence of some of the witnesses the applicants are at liberty to move fresh bail application before the trial Court which shall be decided on merits. The application is disposed of. H.B.T./M-275/K Order accordingly.