1986 P Cr (PLP)
BARKAT SHAH Petitioner Versus Mst. SULTAN ZARI and others Respondents
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BARKAT SHAH Petitioner Versus Mst. SULTAN ZARI and others Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (BARKAT SHAH Petitioner Versus Mst. SULTAN ZARI and others Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Ashraf Khan Gadoon for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(5)‑‑Bail cancellation of‑‑Cancellation of bail of accused‑lady urged on ground that she was living with persons not of good character and as such misused her liberty, yet no evidence led to prove bad character of her associates‑‑Respondent, being a woman, held, under law entitled to grant of bail‑‑Cancellation of bail declined‑ circum stances.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 246 of 1982, decided on 2nd June, 1982.
S. 497(5)‑‑Bail cancellation of‑‑Cancellation of bail of accused‑lady urged on ground that she was living with persons not of good character and as such misused her liberty, yet no evidence led to prove bad character of her associates‑‑Respondent, being a woman, held, under law entitled to grant of bail‑‑Cancellation of bail declined‑ circum stances. Muhammad Ashraf Khan Gadoon for Petitioner. He contends the respondent No. 1 is now living with the persons who are not of good character. He, therefore, submits that her bail may be cancelled Besides the fact that there is no positive evidence before me to show of what character the respondents 2 and 3 are, the ground urged is not sufficient for the cancellation of bail. The concession granted to her does not seem to have been misused and she being a women under the law is entitled to the grant of bail. This application, being without merits, is, therefore, dismissed in limine. 2. It has been brought to my notice that in spite of clear direction by this Court to the Investigating Agency to put in challan in the Court as early as possible, the Investigating Agency has not yet sub mitted the challan to the Court concerned hay be that the Investigating Agency was not aware of the order of this Court. That direction is repeated and the copy of the order be sent to the S.H.O. concerned with a clear direction that if the order of this Court is not complied with within 15 days, then suitable action would be taken against the person found guilty of non‑compliance of the order of the Court. S. G. D. Bail maintained.