2002 PLP 1142 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 1142 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Zafar Pasha Chaudhary, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1142 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1142 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Zafar Pasha Chaudhary, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1142 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- N.A. Butt for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497(a)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/148/149‑‑‑Bail, grant ‑‑Accused, according to investigation was not responsible for commission of murder and four specific persons had been found to be the culprits‑‑‑Allegation that accused was vicariously liable for murder or that he had abetted the commission of offence in any manner, was a question which was open to further inquiry‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail. M. Aslam Malik for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4184/B of 2001, decided on 4th September. 2001. ‑‑‑‑S. 497(a)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/148/149‑‑‑Bail, grant ‑‑Accused, according to investigation was not responsible for commission of murder and four specific persons had been found to be the culprits‑‑‑Allegation that accused was vicariously liable for murder or that he had abetted the commission of offence in any manner, was a question which was open to further inquiry‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail. N.A. Butt for Petitioner. M. Aslam Malik for the State. The petitioner is accused of an offence under sections 302/148/149 read with section 109, P.P.C. Earlier the case was registered under section 365, P.P.C. and section 364 was added. According to learned counsel, there is no evidence against the petitioner. However; as per investigation, 17 accused persons including the petitioner took deceased Iftikhar alias Tari alongwith them. Subsequently on the basis of the evidence collected during the investigation, it was found that four accused‑persons, namely, Ata Muhammad, Maajid, Latif and Liaqat committed murder of deceased Iftikhar alias Tari. The statement of the deceased's father is also to the same effect. As according to the investigation, the petitioner is not responsible for commission of murder and four specific persons have been found to be concerned with the murder, therefore, the allegation that the p petitioner is vicariously liable for the, murder committed or he has absetted the commission of offence in any manner is a question which is open to further inquiry. He is, therefore, admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of) the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M‑1126/L Bail granted.