1981 PLP 3 (CLC)
GHULAM DASTGIR AND 6 OTHERS‑Appellants/Defendants Versus HIDAYAT AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents/Plaintiffs
| Citation | 1981 PLP 3 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Karrar Hussain Zaidi, J |
| Parties | GHULAM DASTGIR AND 6 OTHERS‑Appellants/Defendants Versus HIDAYAT AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents/Plaintiffs |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 3 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 3 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Karrar Hussain Zaidi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 3 (CLC) (GHULAM DASTGIR AND 6 OTHERS‑Appellants/Defendants Versus HIDAYAT AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents/Plaintiffs). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Jamshed Ali for Appellants.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑ ‑‑ Ss. 20 & 21‑‑Succession to original tenancy‑Section 20 being self -contained law of succession does not require help of personal law for its interpretation and enforcement‑Sons of predeceased son of original tenant‑Held, entitled to inherit original tenancy left by their grand‑father alongwith his living sons, as representatives of their deceased father ‑ Muhammadan Law ‑ Succession ‑ Doctrine of Exclusion.‑‑[Muhammadan Law]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑ S. 115‑Revision‑Concurrent findings of Courts below based upon correct appraisal of law and fact on subject‑Held, cannot be interfered with in revisional jurisdiction under S. 115.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Revision No. 690/D of 1980, decided on 14th June, 1980. (a) Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑ ‑‑ Ss. 20 & 21‑‑Succession to original tenancy‑Section 20 being self -contained law of succession does not require help of personal law for its interpretation and enforcement‑Sons of predeceased son of original tenant‑Held, entitled to inherit original tenancy left by their grand‑father alongwith his living sons, as representatives of their deceased father ‑ Muhammadan Law ‑ Succession ‑ Doctrine of Exclusion.‑‑[Muhammadan Law]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑ S. 115‑Revision‑Concurrent findings of Courts below based upon correct appraisal of law and fact on subject‑Held, cannot be interfered with in revisional jurisdiction under S.
115. Syed Jamshed Ali for Appellants.