1987 PLP 1032 (MLD)
YOUSUF MASIH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1032 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ali Nawaz Budhani, J |
| Parties | YOUSUF MASIH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1032 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1032 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ali Nawaz Budhani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1032 (MLD) (YOUSUF MASIH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(5)/439--Accused on bail absenting himself Non bailable warrants issued by Court--Bail formerly granted to accused, held, automatically stood cancelled--Issue of non-bailable warrant Tanta mounting to cancellation of bail and.-Issue of summons and notice to surety before issue of non-bailable warrant, held further, not necessary.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Revision No. 20 of 1984, decided on 7th March, 1984.
S. 497(5)/439--Accused on bail absenting himself Non bailable warrants issued by Court--Bail formerly granted to accused, held, automatically stood cancelled--Issue of non-bailable warrant Tanta mounting to cancellation of bail and.-Issue of summons and notice to surety before issue of non-bailable warrant, held further, not necessary. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Appellant. This criminal revision is urged today. One Yousuf Masih was absent on 18-5-1983 and the learned Additional Judge issued non bailable warrants against him. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that on the perusal of diary, dated 18-5-1983, it does not disclose that the bail of accused/ applicant Yousuf Masih was cancelled. Therefore, Yousuf Masih is deemed to be on bail and the issuance of non-bailable warrants was as such illegal. I have considered the diary, dated 18-5-1983. Yousuf Masih the present applicant was on bail. His absence from the Court was considered and non-bailable warrants were issued against him. The very issuance of non-bailable warrants tantamounts to cancellation of his bail and this is the only interpretation to be given to the words "issue non-bailable warrants against Yousaf Masih". Now, it is not necessary as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that in the first instance summons are to be issued and notice to the surety is to be issued and in the second instance bailable warrants are to be issued and * in' the last resort non-bailable warrants are to be issued. The learned counsel did not show me the law on the point that the stages of securing the accused are firstly, summons and then by bailable warrants and. then by non-bailable warrants. This criminal revision fails and it is accordingly dismissed. The learned Advocate has been advised to repeat the bail application before the lower Court. M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.