1988 P Cr (PLP)
NAEEM alias KALU‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khizar Hayat, J |
| Parties | NAEEM alias KALU‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khizar Hayat, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (NAEEM alias KALU‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Rafiq Khan Chauhan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 16‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497‑‑Bail‑ Eye‑witnesses swearing affidavit about innocence of accused‑‑Bail granted.‑‑[ Affidavit]. Wafadar Khan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 16‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497‑‑Bail‑ Eye‑witnesses swearing affidavit about innocence of accused‑‑Bail granted.‑‑[ Affidavit]. Muhammad Rafiq Khan Chauhan for Petitioner. Wafadar Khan for the State. The petitioner is stated to have stolen a tape recorder on the night between 14/15 September, 1987. He was seen committing theft by the complainant as well as Asif and Akhtar P.Ws. but they could not arrest him as he managed to escape from the spot. The petitioner was allowed pre‑arrest bail which was subsequently re‑called. The petitioner is stated to be in jail since October, 1987.
2. The petitioner's bail plea was declined by the lower Court hence this petition.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
4. It is stated that the two eye‑witnesses namely Asif and Akhtar have sworn affidavits about the innocence of the petitioner. In the circumstances, I feel inclined and allow this petition. The petitioner shall be released on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of A . C . /Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala. M.Y.H./N‑85/L Bail granted.