2002 PLP 450 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD ZAHID ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑ Respondent,
| Citation | 2002 PLP 450 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ZAHID ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑ Respondent, |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 450 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 450 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 450 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD ZAHID ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑ Respondent,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Sardar Riaz Ahmad for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code , (XLV of 1860), S.302/34‑‑‑Bail, g n of‑‑ Accused did not cause any injury to the deceased‑‑‑Report of post mortem had revealed that the deceased did not receive any blunt weapon injury‑‑ ‑Whether the accused had shared common intention with the co‑accused, would be determined by the Trial Court after, recording the evidence‑‑‑Allegation against the accused needing further inquiry, the accused was admitted to bail.
Judgment & Decree
‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code , (XLV of 1860), S.302/34‑‑‑Bail, g n of‑‑ Accused did not cause any injury to the deceased‑‑‑Report of post mortem had revealed that the deceased did not receive any blunt weapon injury‑‑ ‑Whether the accused had shared common intention with the co‑accused, would be determined by the Trial Court after, recording the evidence‑‑‑Allegation against the accused needing further inquiry, the accused was admitted to bail. Sardar Riaz Ahmad for Petitioner. Ghazanfar Ali Khan for the State. Muhammad Zahid, petitioner has sought his post‑arrest bail in a case F.I.R. No.593 of 2001 registered oil 30‑12‑2001, for offences under sections 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station City, Sadiqabad.
2. The precise allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith Shahid caught hold Samaar Khan, son of the, complainant, while Muhammad Nawaz co‑accussed was beating him and within his view Muhammad Nawaz fired at Samaar Khan with his pistol, which hit on his forehead. Muhammad, Nawaz fired again and that too hit the forehead of Samaar Khan; who succumbed to the injuries at the spot.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone, through the record.
4. Admittedly, the petitioner did not cause any injury to the deceased. The report of post‑mortem reveals that the deceased did not receive any blunt weapon injury. Whether the petitioner shared common intention with' the co‑accused would be determined by the trial Court after recording of evidence. Presently, the allegation against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the ambit of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C., therefore, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum 'of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M‑950/L Bail granted.