1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUHAMMAD IQBAL Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Aziz Malik, Member-I |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IQBAL Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Aziz Malik, Member-I.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMAD IQBAL Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Yasin Bhatti for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, DA. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 25th August, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Rr. 3(a) & 6(3)(i)
Dismissal from service on charge of receiving stolen property
Civil servant, who was police constable, was dismissed from service after serving with show-cause notice on charge of receiving stolen property
Charge against civil servant, for which he was dismissed from service stood proved against him from relevant record beyond any reasonable doubt and he had failed to rebut same by means of any authentic oral or documentary evidence
Civil servant being a member of police force had been found guilty of heinous crime, which was unbecoming and the least expected of a custodian of law and order and as such, did not deserve any lenient penalty short of dismissal from service.
Judgment & Decree
INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others Appeal No. 4 of 1991, decided on 28th September, 1991.
Rr. 3(a) & 6(3)(i)
Dismissal from service on charge of receiving stolen property
Civil servant, who was police constable, was dismissed from service after serving with show-cause notice on charge of receiving stolen property
Charge against civil servant, for which he was dismissed from service stood proved against him from relevant record beyond any reasonable doubt and he had failed to rebut same by means of any authentic oral or documentary evidence
Civil servant being a member of police force had been found guilty of heinous crime, which was unbecoming and the least expected of a custodian of law and order and as such, did not deserve any lenient penalty short of dismissal from service. Muhammad Yasin Bhatti for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, DA. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 25th August, 1991.