CLC 1981

1981 PLP 1231 (CLC)

Syed QAMAR MOINI‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD AND 3 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
1930-April-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 1231 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties Syed QAMAR MOINI‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD AND 3 others — Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1231 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1231 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1231 (CLC) (Syed QAMAR MOINI‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD AND 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Mushtaq Ahmad Memon for Respondent No. 4.

Headnotes / Summary

Transfer of propertyApplication form in respect of a particular property, held, must be considered together for purpose of determining entitlement for transfer among various applicants.

Judgment & Decree

Dr. Munawar Ali Khan v. Chief Settlement Commissioner 1976 S C M R 54 rel. (b) Settlement Scheme No. I

Transfer of propertyApplication form in respect of a particular property, held, must be considered together for purpose of determining entitlement for transfer among various applicants. Fateh Muhammad v. Maula Bakhsh P L D 1963 S C 311 and Muhammad Saqlain v. Muhammad Amir P L D 1968 Lah. 157 rel. (c) Settlement Scheme No. I

Transfer of property‑Chief Settlement Commissioner declaring property to be not a big mansion and directing matter of transfer to be disposed of according to law under Settlement Scheme No. 1‑Order of Chief Settlement Commissioner being an administrative order, held, did not affect any rights of appellant as to his plea of order being without notice to him qua his application for transfer‑Even' otherwise Deputy Settlement Commissioner could consider claim of respondent even after initial ex parte order of transfer in favour of appellant. Abdul Hamid v. Sardar Bcgum 1977 S C M R 227 rel. S. M. Hassan for Appellant. Mushtaq Ahmad Memon for Respondent No.

4. Dates of hearing : 5th and 9th March, 1980.