1992 PLP 1855 (MLD)
SIKANDAR IJAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1992 PLP 1855 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SIKANDAR IJAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 1855 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 1855 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 1855 (MLD) (SIKANDAR IJAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Yusuf Ali Khan and Muhammad Asif Jan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13
Involvement of the accused in the case appeared to be mala fide
Judgment & Decree
Yusuf Ali Khan and Muhammad Asif Jan for Petitioner. Sh. Ehsan Ahmad for the State. This is a pathetic case in which a police officer has been involved. It is stated that he has been involved on account of enmity with the S.S.P. Sargodha. Precisely, it is stated that the relations of the S.S.P. Sargodha and the petitioner's family had been, in past, contesting elections against each other and on that score, long-standing enmity exists between the parties and thus, with a view to victimize the petitioner, a false case has b en fabricated against him. In fact, three cases were registered against the petitioner and the investigation of two of these cases was conducted by Mr. Muhammad Amlish, Addl. S.P., Faisalabad, who found these cases to be false. As far as the third case is concerned with regard to the recovery of Klashnikov from the petitioner, the investigation of this case was not allowed to be conducted by Mr Muhammad Amlish. Addl. S.P. and on one pretext or the other, the relevant papers were not sent to him because, in the meanwhile, the trial in the Special Court, constituted under the Suppression of Terrorist Activities Act, 1975, was in progress. To meet the ends of justice,- this Court directed that the investigation of this case should also be transferred to Mr. Muhammad Amlish, Addl. S.P. Considering the case from all angles, and particularly the mala fides appearing in this case, I would direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail, provided, he furnishes security in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rs. one hundred thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. N.H.Q./S-105/L Bail allowed.