1999SCMR 1116 (PLP)
Lt.-Col. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SARGODHA and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1999SCMR 1116 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ |
| Parties | Lt.-Col. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SARGODHA and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999SCMR 1116 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999SCMR 1116 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999SCMR 1116 (PLP) (Lt.-Col. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SARGODHA and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tassawar Hussain Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by: Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 8th July 1998.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 25-6-1998 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in C. Ms. Nos. l and 4 of 1997 in W. P. No. 5721 of 1997).
Arts. 185(3) & 199
Constitutional petition
Interim relief, grant of-- Resumption of land
Leave period had already expired
High Court had declined interim relief to petitioner on ground that period of lease had already expired
Interim order passed by High Court could not be interfered with by Supreme Court
Petitioner, however, would be at liberty to raise all points in support of his case at time of final hearing of Constitutional petition.
Judgment & Decree
IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.
This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, in C.Ms. Nos. l and 4 of 1997 dated 25-6-1998.
2. The dispute herein relates to resumption of disputed land from the petitioner. The High Court has declined the interim relief on the ground that the period of lease has already expired in the year-1996.
3. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, lest it may prejudice the case of either party, we are not inclined to interfere with the interim orders passed by the High Court. Needless to point out that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all points in support of his case at the time of final hearing of the writ petition/.
4. With the above observation, the petition is dismissed and leave refused. H.B.T./M-244/S Petition dismissed.