1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE and 3 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman and Misbah Ullah Khan, Member |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE and 3 others |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman and Misbah Ullah Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMAD ANWAR Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE and 3 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rao Fazal Khan Akhtar for Appellant.
- Hafiz SA. Rehman, Standing Counsel for the Government, alongwith MA. Haseeb Siddiqui for Respondents.
- Dates of hearing: 20th and 22nd August, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Entitlement to emoluments of higher post in Grade-17 to which civil servant was made to serve
Civil servant was found entitled to emoluments of higher post for the period he had been holding such post on previous occasion
Civil servant in earlier appeal having been granted such emoluments for the period he had served in higher post, he was deemed to be entitled to the emoluments subsequent to that period in which he had served in higher grade.
Judgment & Decree
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE and 3 others Appeal No. 510(R) of 1990, decided on 18th September, 1991.
Entitlement to emoluments of higher post in Grade-17 to which civil servant was made to serve
Civil servant was found entitled to emoluments of higher post for the period he had been holding such post on previous occasion
Civil servant in earlier appeal having been granted such emoluments for the period he had served in higher post, he was deemed to be entitled to the emoluments subsequent to that period in which he had served in higher grade. Rao Fazal Khan Akhtar for Appellant. Hafiz SA. Rehman, Standing Counsel for the Government, alongwith MA. Haseeb Siddiqui for Respondents. Dates of hearing: 20th and 22nd August, 1991.