SCMR 1987

1987 PLP 1878 (SCMR)

SHER MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus TAJ MUHAMMAD SHAH and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 750 to 758 of 1985 in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 255 and 370 to 377 of 1980, decided on 17th May, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 1878 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties SHER MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus TAJ MUHAMMAD SHAH and others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1878 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1878 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1878 (SCMR) (SHER MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus TAJ MUHAMMAD SHAH and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Malik Talib Hussain Awan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Salah-ud-Din, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
  • Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record and Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate -on-Record for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 17th May, 1987.

Headnotes / Summary

(On applications for restoration of the above-mentioned petitions dismissed for non-prosecution against the order of this Court dated 1st September, 1985). Art. 185(3)--Petitions for leave to appeal dismissed for non- prosecution--Miscellaneous petitions for restoration of such petitions barred by 49 days--No case for condonation of delay made out- Petitions dismissed.

Judgment & Decree

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J. --These petitions for restoration are barred by 49 days. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are not satisfied that any case for condonation of the delay has been made out. These petitions are accordingly dismissed. S.Q. /S-57/S Petition dismissed.