1991 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ALTAF AHMED Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST through its Chairman and 4 others
| Citation | 1991 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasir Aslam Zahid and Salahuddin Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | ALTAF AHMED Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST through its Chairman and 4 others |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi High Court bench comprising: Nasir Aslam Zahid and Salahuddin Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ALTAF AHMED Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST through its Chairman and 4 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh for Petitioner.
- S. Hamid Hussain for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 (pursuant to Notice).
- NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.---This petition has been admitted to regular hearing. When it came up before this Court on G-12-1990 this Court directed that comments be called from respondents Nos. 1 and 3 within 3 weeks. However, notice was issued to the respondents of the application for interim relief. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain, learned counsel appearing for KPT (respondent No. 2) submits that neither any action has been taken against the petitioner by KPT nor, at this stage, any adverse action against the petitioner is contemplated. It is further submitted by Mr. S. Hamid Hussain that, in case any action is proposed to be taken against the petitioner, such action will be taken strictly according to the rules. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain adds that perusal of the memo. of the petition would show that not a single allegation has been made against the KPT and that there is also no averment, directly or indirectly, that KPT is taking any action for removal of the petitioner from the service of KPT. Mr. Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the submission made by Mr. Hamid Hussain learned counsel for respondent and as such he does not press Petition No. 1377/90, which stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑During hearing of petition, respondent submitted that neither any action had been taken against petitioner by respondent nor any adverse action against him was contemplated‑‑‑Respondent further submitted that in case any action was proposed to be taken against petitioner, such action would be taken strictly in accordance with law‑‑‑Petitioner being satisfied with submissions made by respondent, petition stood dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.
This petition has been admitted to regular hearing. When it came up before this Court on G-12-1990 this Court directed that comments be called from respondents Nos. 1 and 3 within 3 weeks. However, notice was issued to the respondents of the application for interim relief. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain, learned counsel appearing for KPT (respondent No. 2) submits that neither any action has been taken against the petitioner by KPT nor, at this stage, any adverse action against the petitioner is contemplated. It is further submitted by Mr. S. Hamid Hussain that, in case any action is proposed to be taken against the petitioner, such action will be taken strictly according to the rules. Mr. S. Hamid Hussain adds that perusal of the memo. of the petition would show that not a single allegation has been made against the KPT and that there is also no averment, directly or indirectly, that KPT is taking any action for removal of the petitioner from the service of KPT. Mr. Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the submission made by Mr. Hamid Hussain learned counsel for respondent and as such he does not press Petition No. 1377/90, which stands dismissed as withdrawn. The two Miscellaneous Applications have become infructuous. H.B.T./1027/K Petition dismissed.