PLC(CS) 2009

2009 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

MIR MUHAMMAD and another Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary to Education and Literacy Department and 5 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi High Court
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.D-455 of 2008, decided on 2nd December, 2008.
Honorable Judges
Faisal Arab and Abdul Rasheed Kalwar, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Karachi High Court
Bench Members Faisal Arab and Abdul Rasheed Kalwar, JJ
Parties MIR MUHAMMAD and another Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary to Education and Literacy Department and 5 others
Primary Law Singh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Singh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi High Court bench comprising: Faisal Arab and Abdul Rasheed Kalwar, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MIR MUHAMMAD and another Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary to Education and Literacy Department and 5 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Singh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973)

Representation

  • Muhammad Sachal Awan for Petitioners.
  • Allah Bachayo Soomro, Addl. A.-G. Sindh for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 9

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199

Constitutional petition

Promotion

Grievance of the petitioners was that their order of promotion from Primary School Teacher to High School Teacher was withdrawn by the authorities

Counsel for the petitioners had stated that apart from merits of the order which would ultimately decide the petition, petitioners, at least should be given the salaries of Primary School Teachers, which would be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners in the petition

Validity

Only the question of promotion being involved, petitioners were0entitled to get the salary of at least Primary School Teachers

Petitioners having the status of Primary School Tea .hers, their salaries should be paid to them within 15 days.

Judgment & Decree

The grievance of the petitioners is that their order of promotion from Primary School Teacher to High School Teacher was withdrawn by respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that apart from merits of the order which shall ultimately decide this petition, at least petitioners should be given the salaries of Primary School Teachers which shall be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners in this petition. As only the question of promotion is involved, the petitioners are entitled to get the salaries of at least Primary School Teachers. Hence for now, the petitioners shall have the status of Primary School Teachers at least, therefore, their salaries should be paid to them within 15 days. Notice to unserved respondents be repeated. To come up on 24-12-2008. H.B.T./M-16/K Order accordingly.