PCRLJ 1993

1993 P Cr (PLP)

AMAN ULLAH and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1992-October-21
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1993 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties AMAN ULLAH and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 P Cr (PLP) (AMAN ULLAH and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Ch. Liaquat Ali Sandhu for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/11

Bail, grant of

No overt act having been attributed to accused who had not used violence on the alleged abductee it was open to doubt if she had been reduced to illicit purpose to attract mischief of S.11 of the Ordinance

Accused were behind the bars since a considerable period-- Accused were admitted to bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Crl. Misc. No.4593-B of 1992, decided on 21st October, 1992.

S. 497

Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/11

Bail, grant of

No overt act having been attributed to accused who had not used violence on the alleged abductee it was open to doubt if she had been reduced to illicit purpose to attract mischief of S.11 of the Ordinance

Accused were behind the bars since a considerable period-- Accused were admitted to bail in circumstances. Ch. Liaquat Ali Sandhu for Petitioners. Subah Saeed for the State. The complainant Muhammad Nazir found his daughter Mst. Somera missing from his house, he, therefore, started search. After having failed to trace her out, he reported the matter to the police on the 3rd of August, 1992, whereupon a case under section 10/11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VII of 1979 was registered with Police Station Model Town, Gujranwala against the petitioners and others on the allegation that as per statements of Muhammad Ali, Sarfraz and Saleem Muhammad the abductee was seen in company of the petitioners and their co-accused.

2. After recovery the statement of Mst. Somera was got recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. It appears from her statement that she of her own free will had eloped with the petitioners, came to Lahore and after visit to the Zoo they all came back to Gujranwala. While Mst. Somera was on way back home she was accosted by one Irshad who took her to a house where he confined her for three days and committed Zina with her. Since no overt act had been attributed to the petitioners and they had not used violence on her, therefore, it is open to doubt if she had been seduced to illicit purpose to attract mischief of section 11 of the Ordinance VII of 1979. The petitioners are behind the bars since a considerable period. Therefore, they are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/Illaqa Magistrate, Gujranwala. N.H.Q./A-432/L Bail granted.