MLD 1987

1987 PLP 2662 (MLD)

Sardar MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1438-B of 1986/BWP, decided on 6th October, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Khizar Hayat, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 2662 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Khizar Hayat, J
Parties Sardar MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 2662 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 2662 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khizar Hayat, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 2662 (MLD) (Sardar MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Malik Muhammad Aslam for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.498--Bail, pre-arrest--Accused who allegedly fired at a person belonging to complainant party and caused simple injury contending that complainant party despite a stay order issued in favour of accused had forcibly carved out with tractor a pathway in lands of accused and got instant case registered in order to pressurise him and that Sessions Court while refusing pre-arrests bail to accused did no consider in true perspective facts and circumstances of case- Contentions raised requiring examination--Accused admitted to pre-arrest bail.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1438-B of 1986/BWP, decided on 6th October, 1986. --S.498--Bail, pre-arrest--Accused who allegedly fired at a person belonging to complainant party and caused simple injury contending that complainant party despite a stay order issued in favour of accused had forcibly carved out with tractor a pathway in lands of accused and got instant case registered in order to pressurise him and that Sessions Court while refusing pre-arrests bail to accused did no consider in true perspective facts and circumstances of case- Contentions raised requiring examination--Accused admitted to pre-arrest bail. Malik Muhammad Aslam for Petitioner. This is a petition for the grant of pre-arrest bail moved or behalf of Muhammad Hussain Khan, a local Advocate, who allegedly fired at one Siddiq and caused simple hurt on his head. It is stated that the complainant party despite a stay-order issued in favour of the petitioner had forcibly carved out with tractor a pathway in the lands of the petitioner and in order to pressurise and prevent the; petitioner from objecting to the use of way illegally made on the land h of the petitioner, the instant case has been got registered. It is further contended that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge while requiring pre-arrest bail did not consider in true perspective the facts and circumstances of the case: The contention raised needs examination.

2. Admit. Notice.

3. Meanwhile the petitioner is admitted to interim pre-arrest bail till 15-10-1986 in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar of this Court. The s petitioner is however directed to join the investigation meanwhile. M.Y.H./M-400/L Interim anticipatory bail granted.