MLD 1987

1987 PLP 3085 (MLD)

Syed SHABBIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 170-T of 1987, decided on 19th August, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 3085 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J
Parties Syed SHABBIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 3085 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 3085 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 3085 (MLD) (Syed SHABBIR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Rashid Murtaza Qureshi for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.526--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.406/420--Transfer of cases- Contention that cases were registered against accused on instigation of a Police Officer not supported by evidence--Cases actually were registered at the instance of various citizens on allegation that accused had sold their properties fraudulently--No enmity shown to be existing between accused and said Police Officer prior to registration of cases- Cases were likely to be tried were in a fair and just manner by trial Court--Supposed fear of life expressed by accused also without any foundation-- Transfer of case declined in circumstances.

S.526

Transfer of cases--One application for transfer of seven independent cases against one accused, held, not competent.

Judgment & Decree

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S.526

Transfer of cases--One application for transfer of seven independent cases against one accused, held, not competent. Rashid Murtaza Qureshi for Petitioner. Through this petition, Shabbir Hussain accused seeks transfer of seven cases registered against him vide F.I.R. No. 103 dated 11-5-1986, 109 dated 18-5-1986, 110 dated 18-5-1986, 79 dated 26-2-1987, 80 dated 26-2-1987, 92 dated 10-3-1987 and 249 dated 9-7-1987, at P.S. Wah Cantt, District Rawalpindi. The cases are pending in the Court of Resident Magistrate, Wah Cantt. Rawalpindi. These cases were registered at the instance of various persons under section 406/420 etc. PPC.

2. In support of this petition, only three grounds have been urged. Firstly, that the cases were falsely registered against the petitioner at the instance of Masood Khan Bangash DSP and as such, it will not be possible for the petitioner to defend these cases at Wah Cantt; secondly, that the complainants in all these cases belong to Hayat family who is very influential in the Ilaqa. The petitioner, therefore, does not expect justice from Courts at Wah Cantt; and thirdly, the petitioner apprehends danger to his life.

3. I have conceded the above contentions. Excepting the affidavit of the petitioner, there is no evidence that the cases were registered against the petitioner on the instigation of Masood Khan Bangash DSP. It is admitted at the Bar that the cases were registered at the instance of various citizens on the allegation that the petitioner had sold their properties fraudulently. It cannot, therefore, at this stag be held that the said DSP manoeuvred the said cases against the petitioner. The learned counsel was unable to point out any enmity between the petitioner and the DSP prior to registration of these cases. So far as the influence of Hayat family is concerned, the learned counsel was not able to say that the learned Resident Magistrate was, in any way, under their influence. I am sure that the learned Resident Magistrate will hold trial in a fair and just manner according to law, by allowing full opportunity to the petitioner to defend himself. It is not possible to hold on the basis of the imaginary fear of the petitioner that the learned Resident Magistrate would, in any way act under the influence of the said Hayat family. I inquired from they learned counsel as to what he meant by Hayat family. He was unable to specify any individual name of the said family who could influence the Resident Magistrate. The supposed fear of life expressed by they petitioner is also without any foundation. His family resides at Waft Cantt. The fear to his life does not appear to be based on any, cogent reasons. I, therefore, find no merits in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. It may here be added that even otherwise, one petition for transfer of seven independent cases against the petitioner was not competent. M. Y. H. IS-102/L Petition dismissed.