1994 PLP 1507(1) (SCMR)
M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT through Registrar‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1507(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ, Saleem Akhtar and Manzoor Hussain Sial, JJ |
| Parties | M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT through Registrar‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1507(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1507(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ, Saleem Akhtar and Manzoor Hussain Sial, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1507(1) (SCMR) (M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE HIGH COURT through Registrar‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.D. Tahri, Advocate instructed by Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
- Irfan Qadir, Addl., A.‑G., Punjab instructed by Rao Muhammad Yousaf, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 9th February, 1994.
- M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Imposition of condition ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ Condition of deposit of security imposed by the High Court for taking further proceedings in the Constitutional petition was without lawful authority and unwarranted in law.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, C.J.‑‑‑For reasons to be recorded separate the condition of deposit of security imposed by the learned Judge as a condition precedent for taking further proceedings in the writ petition is held to be without lawful authority and to be unwarranted in law. The writ petition succeeds and is accordingly accepted, but with no order as to cost. M.B.A./M‑2026/S Petition accepted.