1994MLD576 (PLP)
SHALIMAR FILTER INDUSTRIES through Tariq Javed — Appellant Versus Syed JARAR MUSTAFA BOKHARI — Defendant
| Citation | 1994MLD576 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHALIMAR FILTER INDUSTRIES through Tariq Javed — Appellant Versus Syed JARAR MUSTAFA BOKHARI — Defendant |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994MLD576 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994MLD576 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994MLD576 (PLP) (SHALIMAR FILTER INDUSTRIES through Tariq Javed — Appellant Versus Syed JARAR MUSTAFA BOKHARI — Defendant). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
O.XXIII, R.3 & O.XLI, R.33
Disposal of appeal .on basis of compromise- Parties stating before Appellate Court that compromise having been effected between them, appellant (plaintiff) had undertaken to withdraw the suit filed by him pending in the Court below
Appellant in accordance with such compromise did not press application for temporary injunction, which was disposed of as having been withdrawn
Parties also agreed that criminal complaint before Magistrate would be withdrawn by the appellant-- Respondent had undertaken to abide by the terms of compromise whereby he had accepted-appellant's claim as set out in his suit pending in the Court below, which appellant would withdraw
Appeal was disposed of in accordance with the terms of compromise.
Judgment & Decree
Learned counsel for the parties state that there has been a compromise between the parties in accordance with which the appellant has undertaken to withdraw the civil suit filed by him pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Lahore. It is further stated by them that in accordance with the said compromise, the appellant does not press the application for temporary injunction, which is disposed of, as having been withdrawn.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has also undertaken not to manufacture or market any air or oil filter under the name of International or National or some other name having similar connotation. The respondent has also agreed to withdraw the application filed by him before the Registrar of Trade Marks. The parties have also agreed that the criminal complaint before the Magistrate shall be withdrawn by the appellant and the printed material taken into possession by the learned Magistrate may be handed over to the appellant. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. AA./S-286/L Order accordingly.