1990 PLP 910 (SCMR)
AMJAD ALI SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDULLAH alias DULLAH‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1990 PLP 910 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zillah and S. Usman Ali Shall, JJ |
| Parties | AMJAD ALI SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDULLAH alias DULLAH‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 910 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 910 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zillah and S. Usman Ali Shall, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 910 (SCMR) (AMJAD ALI SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDULLAH alias DULLAH‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abid Hassan Minto, Advocate and S. Abid Nawa7, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 19th August, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 10‑11‑1986 of the Lahore High Court, in F.A.O. No.233 of 1986). ‑‑‑OXXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Grant of temporary injunction‑‑‑Temporary injunction against possible alienation of suit property having been refused by High Court, petitioner sought leave to appeal against that refusal‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused with observations that if and when suit property would be sought to be alienated, prior information in that behalf should be laid before Trial Court, subject to condition that suit property had not so far been‑alienated.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑OXXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Grant of temporary injunction‑‑‑Temporary injunction against possible alienation of suit property having been refused by High Court, petitioner sought leave to appeal against that refusal‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused with observations that if and when suit property would be sought to be alienated, prior information in that behalf should be laid before Trial Court, subject to condition that suit property had not so far been‑alienated. Abid Hassan Minto, Advocate and S. Abid Nawa7, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 19th August, 1989. MLJHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑‑A temporary injunction against possible alienation of the suit property having been refused the petitioner has sought leave to appeal against refusal. After hearing the learned counsel we consider it proper to observe that if and when the suit property is sought to be alienated prior information in that behalf shall be laid before the learned trial Court. This, however, is subject to the condition that the suit property has not been alienated by now. With the foregoing observation, leave to appeal is refused. H.B.T./A‑621 /S Leave to appeal refused.