2006 PLP 1120 (YLR)
ALLAH DITTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1120 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and M. A. Shahid Siddiqui, JJ |
| Parties | ALLAH DITTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1120 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1120 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and M. A. Shahid Siddiqui, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1120 (YLR) (ALLAH DITTA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mehr Muhammad Waris Bharwana for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Petition for
Petitioner who sought suspension of sentence during pendency of his appeal, was a juvenile as his age was seventeen years
Case against petitioner appeared to be at par with that of his co-accused whose sentences had already been suspended and had been released on bail
No reason existed as to why petitioner could not be treated in the matter of suspension of sentences and release on bail in same manner as the co-accused
Sentence of petitioner had been suspended accordingly. Miss Tasneem Amin for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Through this miscellaneous petition Allah Ditta petitioner-appellant has sought suspension of his sentences and released on bail during the pendency of his appeal before this Court.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the judgment passed by the learned trial Court we have observed that the petitioner's age had been recorded by the learned trial Court as seventeen years and, thus, he was a juvenile. As regards the merits of the petitioner's case the case against the petitioner appears to be at par with that against his co-convict namely Muhammad Hussain whose sentences have already been suspended and who has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 12-5-2005 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 of 2005 in Criminal Appeal No.607 of 2005. There is, thus, no reason why the petitioner may not be treated in the matter of suspension of sentences and release on bail in the same manner as the said co-convict. This miscellaneous petition is, therefore, allowed, the sentences passed by the learned trial Court against the petitioner are suspended and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of,Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees one hundred thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./A-593/L?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition allowed.