2009 PLP 1162 (YLR)
RABEL alias RABO alias SIKANDAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 1162 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J |
| Parties | RABEL alias RABO alias SIKANDAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1162 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1162 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1162 (YLR) (RABEL alias RABO alias SIKANDAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.11/16
State Counsel had conceded to the grant of bail to accused on the ground that as on the same footing, co-accused had been granted pre-arrest bail by the High Court and he had no objection if accused was enlarged on bail
Accused was granted bail, in circumstances. Manzoor Ahmed Junejo for Applicant. Ghulam Sarwar Korai for the State.
Judgment & Decree
FARRUKH ZIA G. SHAIKH, J.
Applicant Rabel alias Rabo alias Sikandar son of Anwar Ali by caste Soomro has filed this application under sections 497/498, Cr.P.C. r/w section 7 of Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, seeking post-arrest bail, who is required in F.I.R. Crime No.63 of 2006 registered at Police Station, Bhiria, District Naushahro Feroze for an offence under sections 11/16 Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood Ordinance). Mr. Manzoor Ahmed Junejo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, has argued that co-accused Bashir Ahmed, has already been granted bail before arrest by this Court vide order dated 9-10-2006 and the case of the present applicant is also on same footing; that the name of the applicant is not disclosed in the F.I.R. but the same only appears in 164, Cr.P.C. statement of the abductee Mst. Sumera; that at the time of incident, the applicant was 16 years of age and has remained in Jail since about two years; that the applicant being juvenile, is entitled to the concession of bail as his case comes within the ambit of section 7(a) of Juvenile Justice System Ordinance. Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Korai, learned counsel appearing for the State, has frankly conceded to the grant of bail on the ground that on the same footing co-accused Bashir Ahmed has been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court, therefore, he has no objection if the present applicant is enlarged on bail. Keeping in view the above position, the applicant Rabel alias Raboalias Sikander is granted bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Application stands disposed of. H.B.T./R-43/K Bail granted.